FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.): 2
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 71 MG | 224 MG |