FIELD ROAST vs CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FIELD ROAST wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
FIELD ROAST: 7
vs
CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FIELD ROAST | CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 272 cal | 295 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 13.0 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 13.0 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FIELD ROAST | CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FIELD ROAST | CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 22 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.0 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 565 MG | 67 MG |