ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS vs WILD CAUGHT CHILEAN SEA BASS FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS: 6
vs
WILD CAUGHT CHILEAN SEA BASS FILLETS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT CHILEAN SEA BASS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 218 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 10.3 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 16.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.6 g | 26.2 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT CHILEAN SEA BASS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT CHILEAN SEA BASS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 12 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 369 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 448 MG | 54 MG |