ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER vs HADDOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER: 4
vs
HADDOCK FILLETS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 235 cal | 159 cal | |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 9.7 g | |
| Carbs | 18.6 g | 18.6 g | |
| Fat | 13.7 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 520 MG | 88 MG |