ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER vs BUFFALO SPICED SOUTHERN STYLE BREADED ALASKA WILD POLLOCK WINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUFFALO SPICED SOUTHERN STYLE BREADED ALASKA WILD POLLOCK WINGS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER: 3
vs
BUFFALO SPICED SOUTHERN STYLE BREADED ALASKA WILD POLLOCK WINGS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | BUFFALO SPICED SOUTHERN STYLE BREADED ALASKA WILD POLLOCK WINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 235 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 9.2 g | |
| Carbs | 18.6 g | 18.5 g | |
| Fat | 13.7 g | 3.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | BUFFALO SPICED SOUTHERN STYLE BREADED ALASKA WILD POLLOCK WINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | BUFFALO SPICED SOUTHERN STYLE BREADED ALASKA WILD POLLOCK WINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 134 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 520 MG | 613 MG |