ENGLISH MUFFIN vs TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
ENGLISH MUFFIN: 3
vs
TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ENGLISH MUFFIN | TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 317 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 48.8 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ENGLISH MUFFIN | TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ENGLISH MUFFIN | TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.2 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 573 MG | 568 MG |