EMERALD BAY ORGANIC CHERRIES vs COCOA DUSTED WRAPPED CASHEWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COCOA DUSTED WRAPPED CASHEWS wins in 9 out of 16 nutrient categories
EMERALD BAY ORGANIC CHERRIES: 5
vs
COCOA DUSTED WRAPPED CASHEWS: 9
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMERALD BAY ORGANIC CHERRIES | COCOA DUSTED WRAPPED CASHEWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 32.1 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 42.9 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMERALD BAY ORGANIC CHERRIES | COCOA DUSTED WRAPPED CASHEWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin K (phylloquinone) | 0 UG | 28.6 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMERALD BAY ORGANIC CHERRIES | COCOA DUSTED WRAPPED CASHEWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 0 MG | |
| Copper, Cu | 0 MG | 4.3 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.6 MG | 6.4 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 214 MG | |
| Manganese, Mn | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 357 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 679 MG | 500 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 71 MG | 464 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 5.4 MG |