CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK vs 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF TOP ROUND FOR LONDON BROIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF TOP ROUND FOR LONDON BROIL wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK: 2
vs
100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF TOP ROUND FOR LONDON BROIL: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF TOP ROUND FOR LONDON BROIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 295 cal | 116 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 24.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 25 g | 2.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF TOP ROUND FOR LONDON BROIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF TOP ROUND FOR LONDON BROIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 2.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 339 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 36 MG |