CRISPY BATTERED WHOLE FISH FILLETS vs ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CRISPY BATTERED WHOLE FISH FILLETS: 3
vs
ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CRISPY BATTERED WHOLE FISH FILLETS | ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 218 cal | 157 cal | |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 17.1 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 6.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CRISPY BATTERED WHOLE FISH FILLETS | ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CRISPY BATTERED WHOLE FISH FILLETS | ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 91 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 709 MG | 286 MG |