COOKED WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER vs WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER: 5
vs
WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 15.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 200 MG | 301 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 388 MG | 106 MG |