CONCIERGE BLEND ROASTED CASHEWS & ALMONDS vs WOODSTOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
CONCIERGE BLEND ROASTED CASHEWS & ALMONDS: 4
vs
WOODSTOCK: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CONCIERGE BLEND ROASTED CASHEWS & ALMONDS | WOODSTOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 515 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 12.1 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 39.4 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 39.4 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 6.1 g | 10 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CONCIERGE BLEND ROASTED CASHEWS & ALMONDS | WOODSTOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CONCIERGE BLEND ROASTED CASHEWS & ALMONDS | WOODSTOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 121 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.3 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 424 MG | 33 MG |