CIABATTA LUNGA vs CHICAGO FLATS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICAGO FLATS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CIABATTA LUNGA: 3
vs
CHICAGO FLATS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CIABATTA LUNGA | CHICAGO FLATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 389 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 51.8 g | 55.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 13.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 5.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CIABATTA LUNGA | CHICAGO FLATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CIABATTA LUNGA | CHICAGO FLATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 111 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 536 MG | 722 MG |