CHILEAN SEABASS vs TUNA STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TUNA STEAK wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHILEAN SEABASS: 1
vs
TUNA STEAK: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHILEAN SEABASS | TUNA STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 181 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 40.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 14.1 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHILEAN SEABASS | TUNA STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHILEAN SEABASS | TUNA STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 12 MG | 40 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 59 MG | 60 MG |