CHICKEN SALAD SUB ROLL W/ LETTUCE & TOMATO vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN SALAD SUB ROLL W/ LETTUCE & TOMATO: 3
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN SALAD SUB ROLL W/ LETTUCE & TOMATO | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 149 cal | 212 cal | |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 10.2 g | |
| Carbs | 11.2 g | 24.7 g | |
| Fat | 8.2 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN SALAD SUB ROLL W/ LETTUCE & TOMATO | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.3 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN SALAD SUB ROLL W/ LETTUCE & TOMATO | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 15 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 138 MG | 592 MG |