CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs WILD CAUGHT SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA IN WATER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA IN WATER wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 0
vs
WILD CAUGHT SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA IN WATER: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD CAUGHT SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 107 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 26.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD CAUGHT SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD CAUGHT SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 393 MG |