CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 15 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 5
vs
WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 114 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 22.9 g | 26.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 10 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0.9 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 136 MG | 321 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 110 UG | 0 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 257 MG | 321 MG |