CHICKEN FRANKS vs NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 4
vs
NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 288 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 12.1 g | |
| Carbs | 8.9 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 25.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING SNAPPY GRILLERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 946 MG | 848 MG |