CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK vs UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK: 4
vs
UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK | UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK | UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK | UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 429 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,821 MG | 839 MG |