CANNED SAURY vs MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CANNED SAURY: 2
vs
MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANNED SAURY | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 280 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 21.8 g | |
| Carbs | 12 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fat | 17 g | 29.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANNED SAURY | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANNED SAURY | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 40 MG | 455 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 510 MG | 1,455 MG |