CALAMARI RINGS vs SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CALAMARI RINGS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CALAMARI RINGS: 4
vs
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CALAMARI RINGS | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 40 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 9 g | 16.8 g | |
| Carbs | 1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CALAMARI RINGS | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CALAMARI RINGS | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 40 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 630 MG | 212 MG |