BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK vs PROSCIUTTO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PROSCIUTTO wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK: 3
vs
PROSCIUTTO: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK | PROSCIUTTO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 32.1 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK | PROSCIUTTO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK | PROSCIUTTO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 810 MG | 2,036 MG |