BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON vs WHOLE OYSTERS PACKED IN WATER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON: 4
vs
WHOLE OYSTERS PACKED IN WATER: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | WHOLE OYSTERS PACKED IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 94 cal | 141 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 9.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | WHOLE OYSTERS PACKED IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 10.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 376 MG | 114 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 282 MG | 333 MG |