BONELESS vs ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BONELESS: 5
vs
ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 218 cal | |
| Protein | 14.2 g | 10.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 12.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 23 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 186 MG | 448 MG |