BOLOGNA vs SLOW COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED HAM wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BOLOGNA: 2
vs
SLOW COOKED HAM: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BOLOGNA | SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 342 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 10.5 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 29.0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BOLOGNA | SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 26.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BOLOGNA | SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,079 MG | 1,125 MG |