BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM vs CHICKEN FLORENTINE BONELESS WHITE CHICKEN IN A CREAMY SPINACH SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM: 5
vs
CHICKEN FLORENTINE BONELESS WHITE CHICKEN IN A CREAMY SPINACH SAUCE: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM | CHICKEN FLORENTINE BONELESS WHITE CHICKEN IN A CREAMY SPINACH SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 17.1 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.4 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM | CHICKEN FLORENTINE BONELESS WHITE CHICKEN IN A CREAMY SPINACH SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 10.7 MG | 1.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM | CHICKEN FLORENTINE BONELESS WHITE CHICKEN IN A CREAMY SPINACH SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,393 MG | 429 MG |