BETTY CROCKER vs WHOLE BALANCED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHOLE BALANCED ALMONDS wins in 8 out of 12 nutrient categories
BETTY CROCKER: 1
vs
WHOLE BALANCED ALMONDS: 8
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BETTY CROCKER | WHOLE BALANCED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 714 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 64.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 13.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BETTY CROCKER | WHOLE BALANCED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BETTY CROCKER | WHOLE BALANCED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 267 MG | |
| Copper, Cu | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 733 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |