BEEF & SWEET POTATO TAMALE vs CAJUN-STYLE CHICKEN PASTA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAJUN-STYLE CHICKEN PASTA wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF & SWEET POTATO TAMALE: 2
vs
CAJUN-STYLE CHICKEN PASTA: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF & SWEET POTATO TAMALE | CAJUN-STYLE CHICKEN PASTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 225 cal | 186 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 7.7 g | |
| Carbs | 17.6 g | 16.4 g | |
| Fat | 13.4 g | 10.6 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF & SWEET POTATO TAMALE | CAJUN-STYLE CHICKEN PASTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 6.3 MG | 5.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF & SWEET POTATO TAMALE | CAJUN-STYLE CHICKEN PASTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 141 MG | 55 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 268 MG | 361 MG |