BEEF CUBED STEAK vs BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF CUBED STEAK: 1
vs
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF CUBED STEAK | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 196 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 21.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 9.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF CUBED STEAK | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF CUBED STEAK | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 26 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 58 MG | 218 MG |