BATTERED ONION RINGS vs CRISPY STEAK FRIES THICK CUT POTATOES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CRISPY STEAK FRIES THICK CUT POTATOES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BATTERED ONION RINGS: 4
vs
CRISPY STEAK FRIES THICK CUT POTATOES: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BATTERED ONION RINGS | CRISPY STEAK FRIES THICK CUT POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 cal | 131 cal | |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 31.8 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 11.4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BATTERED ONION RINGS | CRISPY STEAK FRIES THICK CUT POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.4 MG | 5.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BATTERED ONION RINGS | CRISPY STEAK FRIES THICK CUT POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 393 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 443 MG | 333 MG |