BATTERED FISH PLANKS vs WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BATTERED FISH PLANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BATTERED FISH PLANKS: 5
vs
WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BATTERED FISH PLANKS | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 224 cal | 56 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 27.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 9.4 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BATTERED FISH PLANKS | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BATTERED FISH PLANKS | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 471 MG | 336 MG |