BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN vs AHOLD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
AHOLD wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN: 2
vs
AHOLD: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN | AHOLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 16.2 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0.7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 11.3 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN | AHOLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN | AHOLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 535 MG | 170 MG |