ATLANTIC SPICY SALMON vs MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ATLANTIC SPICY SALMON wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ATLANTIC SPICY SALMON: 5
vs
MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ATLANTIC SPICY SALMON | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 21.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fat | 12.9 g | 29.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ATLANTIC SPICY SALMON | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ATLANTIC SPICY SALMON | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 455 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 282 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 612 MG | 1,455 MG |