ANCIENT WHOLE GRAIN BLEND vs HODGSON MILL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HODGSON MILL wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
ANCIENT WHOLE GRAIN BLEND: 2
vs
HODGSON MILL: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ANCIENT WHOLE GRAIN BLEND | HODGSON MILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 356 cal | 341 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 12.2 g | |
| Carbs | 73.3 g | 73.2 g | |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 3.7 g | |
| Fiber | 8.9 g | 4.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ANCIENT WHOLE GRAIN BLEND | HODGSON MILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ANCIENT WHOLE GRAIN BLEND | HODGSON MILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 49 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 3.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 220 MG |