ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK vs WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK: 4
vs
WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK | WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 157 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 17.1 g | 44.3 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK | WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK | WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 29 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 943 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 150 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 286 MG | 179 MG |