ALASKA SKINLESS vs TILAPIA FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALASKA SKINLESS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
ALASKA SKINLESS: 5
vs
TILAPIA FILLET: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKA SKINLESS | TILAPIA FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 70 cal | 87 cal | |
| Protein | 17.6 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKA SKINLESS | TILAPIA FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKA SKINLESS | TILAPIA FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 21 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.1 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 331 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 106 MG | 35 MG |