ZWIEBACK - RUSK vs ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ZWIEBACK - RUSK: 4
vs
ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ZWIEBACK - RUSK | ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 368 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 79.0 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ZWIEBACK - RUSK | ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ZWIEBACK - RUSK | ALMOND PISTACHIO BISCOTTI THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 3.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 167 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 289 MG | 233 MG |