WU CHUNG vs 100% GRASS FED RIBEYE STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WU CHUNG wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
WU CHUNG: 6
vs
100% GRASS FED RIBEYE STEAK: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WU CHUNG | 100% GRASS FED RIBEYE STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 93 cal | 246 cal | |
| Protein | 11.6 g | 18.7 g | |
| Carbs | 2.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.2 g | 19.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WU CHUNG | 100% GRASS FED RIBEYE STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WU CHUNG | 100% GRASS FED RIBEYE STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 11 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 591 MG | 49 MG |