Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA vs Tyson Fully Cooked Oven Roasted Pork and Beef Italian Style Meatballs
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA: 5
vs
Tyson Fully Cooked Oven Roasted Pork and Beef Italian Style Meatballs: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA | Tyson Fully Cooked Oven Roasted Pork and Beef Italian Style Meatballs | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 152.6 cal | 231 cal | |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 16.8 g | |
| Carbs | 2.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 15.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA | Tyson Fully Cooked Oven Roasted Pork and Beef Italian Style Meatballs | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA | Tyson Fully Cooked Oven Roasted Pork and Beef Italian Style Meatballs | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 75 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 989.6 MG | 540 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 710.2 MG | 489 MG |