WORTHINGTON vs COLEMAN PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WORTHINGTON wins in 10 out of 16 nutrient categories
WORTHINGTON: 10
vs
COLEMAN PORK: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WORTHINGTON | COLEMAN PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 9.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 23.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WORTHINGTON | COLEMAN PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 6.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin B-12 | 3.9 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WORTHINGTON | COLEMAN PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 65 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 710 MG | 76 MG |