WILLIAMS & BENNETT vs DECADENT WHITE CHOCOLATE CHUNK MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DECADENT WHITE CHOCOLATE CHUNK MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILLIAMS & BENNETT: 3
vs
DECADENT WHITE CHOCOLATE CHUNK MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | DECADENT WHITE CHOCOLATE CHUNK MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 469 cal | |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 6.3 g | |
| Carbs | 63.6 g | 56.3 g | |
| Fat | 27.3 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | DECADENT WHITE CHOCOLATE CHUNK MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | DECADENT WHITE CHOCOLATE CHUNK MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 91 MG | 31 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.1 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 94 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 391 MG |