WILDWOOD vs BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILDWOOD: 3
vs
BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILDWOOD | BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 59 cal | 188 cal | |
| Protein | 10.6 g | 20.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILDWOOD | BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILDWOOD | BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 29 MG | 54 MG |