WILD SOCKEYE SALMON vs LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD SOCKEYE SALMON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD SOCKEYE SALMON: 4
vs
LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD SOCKEYE SALMON | LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 cal | 223 cal | |
| Protein | 21.1 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD SOCKEYE SALMON | LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD SOCKEYE SALMON | LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,228 MG | 411 MG |