WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON SIDE vs WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON SIDE: 1
vs
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON SIDE | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 168 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 19.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON SIDE | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON SIDE | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 49 MG | 132 MG |