WILD-CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON vs WILD CAUGHT CHILEAN SEA BASS FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON: 6
vs
WILD CAUGHT CHILEAN SEA BASS FILLETS: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON | WILD CAUGHT CHILEAN SEA BASS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 153 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 27.1 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 26.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON | WILD CAUGHT CHILEAN SEA BASS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 12 MG | 12 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 506 MG | 369 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 92 MG | 54 MG |