WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA: 3
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 15.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 447 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 38 MG | 571 MG |