WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA vs CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA: 6
vs
CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 204 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS ALBACORE TUNA | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 18 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 447 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 38 MG | 389 MG |