WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN PINK SALMON vs HERRING FILLETS PIRACKIE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN PINK SALMON wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN PINK SALMON: 6
vs
HERRING FILLETS PIRACKIE: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN PINK SALMON | HERRING FILLETS PIRACKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 277 cal | |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 9.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.5 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN PINK SALMON | HERRING FILLETS PIRACKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 309 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 306 MG | 439 MG |