WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS FILLETS vs ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS FILLETS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS FILLETS: 6
vs
ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS FILLETS | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 235 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 9.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 18.6 g | |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 13.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS FILLETS | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS FILLETS | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 321 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 205 MG | 520 MG |