WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS & BONELESS vs WILD ALASKA CHUM SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS & BONELESS: 3
vs
WILD ALASKA CHUM SALMON: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS & BONELESS | WILD ALASKA CHUM SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 21.4 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS & BONELESS | WILD ALASKA CHUM SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON SKINLESS & BONELESS | WILD ALASKA CHUM SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 250 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 286 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 364 MG |