WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON IN WATER vs BLUE HILL BAY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON IN WATER: 4
vs
BLUE HILL BAY: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON IN WATER | BLUE HILL BAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 191 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 14.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON IN WATER | BLUE HILL BAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON IN WATER | BLUE HILL BAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 73 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 855 MG |